Keep secrets out of Claude Code before they reach a model.
Apply local policy controls to supported Claude Code and coding-agent workflows so API keys, connection strings, and sensitive project terms do not leave the developer's device by accident.
Book a 20-minute callA common developer workflow
A developer asks Claude Code to debug a production error and includes a real connection string.
G.A.I.N. applies the policy at the configured coding workflow. The developer gets a clear response before the sensitive value is shared, rather than finding out after it has left the machine.
Policy response
Production credentials rule
The request is stopped until the sensitive value is removed or replaced with a safe example.
How it works
A policy needs a real control behind it.
Connect the local agent
Install the G.A.I.N. Agent and enrol it with the organization so it can receive the same live policy set as the browser extension.
Apply the right action for the category
Use a warning for reviewable data, local redaction for safe-to-continue requests, or a block for credentials and other high-risk content.
Review the event, not the prompt
The dashboard records the coding tool, policy, action, and category without collecting the developer's prompt text.
Policy actions
Choose the response that fits the risk.
Protect secrets that should never leave
Stop configured credentials, private keys, and other high-risk categories before the request proceeds.
Share the debugging context, not the secret
Replace matching values locally so the coding assistant can still help with the remaining safe context.
Learn before enforcing
Start with metadata-only observation to understand real workflow patterns before choosing stronger actions.
Useful developer controls without a prompt archive.
A security lead can verify that a policy ran in a supported coding workflow without receiving the code, secret, or prompt that triggered it.
- Tool
- Claude Code
- Category
- Connection string
- Action
- Block
- Prompt content
- Not stored
Where this applies
- Supported coding-agent prompts and configured local workflows through the G.A.I.N. Agent.
- Organization policy sync, including category, action, tool, and department scopes.
- Metadata-only events that distinguish developer tooling from browser AI activity.
What it does not claim to do
- It is not a replacement for a secrets manager, repository scanning, or least-privilege access controls.
- Coverage is limited to supported and configured coding workflows, not every desktop application or arbitrary network request.
- Local protection must be installed and healthy on the developer device to enforce a local policy.
Questions
Before you put a policy into production.
Does G.A.I.N. replace a secrets manager?
No. A secrets manager controls how credentials are stored and issued. G.A.I.N. adds a control at the point where a developer might accidentally share one with an AI tool.
Will it stop every Claude Code request?
No. The response depends on the organization policy. Teams can use log-only, warning, redaction, or blocking rules for the categories and supported workflows they choose.
Can a security manager read developer prompts?
No. The dashboard is designed to receive event metadata such as the tool, category, action, and timestamp, not prompt content.
See the policy on your real workflow.
In 20 minutes, we can map the AI tools your team uses and show the policy actions that fit them.
Book a 20-minute call